he/him 
For my personal projects, I am switching to a simpler Cod-I-mean-Code of Conduct, because I felt a bit ridiculous having something more elaborate no there when it's actually just me 99.72% of the time:https://github.com/wincent/wincent/blob/master/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md …
-
This *is* an actual code of conduct, it's just much briefer than most. The difference is that it doesn't use language tailored for projects with much larger communities. We're talking about a side-project with a single maintainer: there is no "project team", no "leadership" etc.
Why does the language about the scope of the community and author matter?
-
-
It seems grossly inaccurate and absurd to talk about the "project maintainers", "project team", "leadership", *of my dotfiles repo*. And not just terminology: take, for example, what the Contributor Covenant says under Enforcement; it is wildly inapplicable:
-
"Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members of the project’s leadership." — there's no universe in which this sentence usefully applies to this kind of repo.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.