JavaScript boy and “lovely thoughtleader” 
he/him 
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
When a project has full-time maintainers that are community-sponsored is it unethical to compete if it means they could be out of a job? How do you quantify a projects value if it could have a negative effect on people’s lives? Utilitarianism? This isn’t targeted or a subtweet.
Nice try. It’s more like: charity pays for someone to give out free hot dogs, then a rich guy opens his own hot dog stand giving out free hot dogs. Hot dogs are the the same. One person is out of a paid job and the rich guy continues the same as before.
Why would people switch hot dog vendors if the quality was equivalent? I thought your question was about innovation in open source, not stagnation. Let the best dog win, regardless of the vendor's personal financial situation!
Because of a perceived improvement based on creator and marketing that may not actually be worth the human cost associated with it existing.
Because open source is free
Yeah but you can make something new and give it to the existing vendor. You make something new. The exisiting person gets to profit from it.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
