Why do you have a right or need to know who funds them? Also the "origin" of its funding is Antony Fisher who founded and self funded them at first, the donors that came after came for the views it already had.
The outcome would definitely be for activists to try to imply that funders are part of a conspiracy due to some tenuous financial relationship from a funder to Soros or the Rothchilds, etc.
-
-
It doesn't make sense to me to argue that it will improve information. It will definitely lower the tone of the discussion for the reasons I stated. Additionally rhetorically asking who funds somebody might be even more useful as a mechanism to try to connote secret conspiracy.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.