Alas, the fraud of hyping supposed big breakthroughs in human governance is far from unpopular. Vastly more progress has been made learning (and improving) how computers work than in figuring out much less improving how humans work. https://twitter.com/La__Cuen/status/1001102779371393024 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
are you intentionally attacking Bitcoin here? This pretty much sums up exactly what is wrong with lauding the original paper as revolutionary.
New forms of technological governance don’t necessarily lead to corresponding change in socioeconomic governance.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mikekelly85 @NickSzabo4
I think his point is that if you want better socioeconomic governance you are barking up the wrong tree. It is much more plausible to use technology to improve computers, than to improve humans.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Doesn't mean that better technology will lead to better outcomes but it is at least a lever that we are able to use.
1:56 AM - 30 May 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.