Search timeline
Replying to
Nah. There are new technologies you might feel excited about (thus disproving DNA’s point), or feel baffled by (reinforcing it) but that’s different from feeling borderline contemptuous because a thing is rubbish. Not everyone who’s laughed at is Galileo, despite their claims.
1
1
1
Yup, AppleScript is certainly in its DNA somewhere, because AppleScript is a jolly good idea; it empowers people who know a little about programming to use that to get things done on their Macs (and it inspired thoughts on this from me 11 years ago: kryogenix.org/days/2009/02/0 :-))
1
1
Replying to
if you set up a company to do that, in the spirit of 23 and Me, be sure to call it Dan And DNA NDA
just read about your new dance floor at DNA (good luck for next month!) It's grey: did you think about making it some fun pattern? Obviously nobody could see it in use, and I know nothing about your business so there may be 20 reasons why it'd be pointless. (Touchups? Cost?)
1
1
Replying to
twitter.com/search?q=from% lists numbers DNA-22370, DNA-22371, DNA-22376, DNA-22403; address sil-opera@(mydomain).org
2
