Search results

  1. People View all

  2. Nov 1

    To all Californians: is a trick. All the ads have these patients saying they'll die bc their clinic would close. Here's the truth: It requires the clinics TO REFUND MONEY THEY OVERCHARGE PATIENTS. The ads don't say THAT at all.

    2 retweets 5 likes
  3. 16 hours ago

    I need help on . I'm so confused 🤨

    2 replies
  4. Nov 3

    You can’t afford to cap profits at 15% but you can afford $100 MILLION to fight ??? Disgusting! You guys need even MORE regulation!

    2 retweets 4 likes
  5. 8 hours ago

    takes all the CA editorial boards to school for getting it wrong on 👏👏 Big Dialysis is spending $111 million to protect their billions. That’s a bargain.

    2 retweets 3 likes
  6. Nov 3

    I’m ready for to be over so that I can stop seeing the same commercials over and over and over and over. I almost want to vote FOR just because I’m tired of the lady on their commercial.

    1 reply 1 like
  7. 6 hours ago

    Both sides of this kidney dialysis fight would like you to think anyone with a kidney is at risk if the other side wins! Will be able to recruit the electorate as "teammates" (corporate speak for what it calls its patients and employees)?

    1 reply
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  8. Oct 31

    The Dialysis Industry Is Spending $111 Million to Argue That Regulating It Would Put It Out of Business. on

    1 reply 5 retweets 5 likes
  9. 22 hours ago

    Don’t let those Hulu adds fool you!!! vote yes on

    1 retweet 5 likes
  10. Nov 2

    Three companies have spent over $100 million dollars opposing . Their message to voters? If we have to spend some of our profits on patient care, we're so poor we'll close clinics. THEY JUST SPENT $100 MILLION ON POLITICAL ADS. Pls, Vote

    Just 3 companies -- Denver-based DaVita Healthcare Partners, US Renal Care in Plano, Texas, and Fresenius Medical Care North America, a subsidiary of the German-based Fresenius Medical Care -- account for nearly 98% of the money opposing .
    9 retweets 9 likes
  11. Oct 29

    Hey y’all I’m taking suggestions on what to vote for on

    10 replies 2 likes
  12. Nov 1

    If we’re such a great idea, why don’t the ads describe what it would actually do to make renal dialysis centers more financially accountable, rather than trying to scare the crap out of voters (again) with lies about what would do. I’m voting

    2 replies 3 retweets 8 likes
  13. Nov 3

    A study by former CA Legislative Analyst and economic think tank Berkeley Research Group found that if passes, 83% of dialysis clinics in CA would operate at a loss. Dialysis clinics would be forced to cut services or close.

    6 retweets 5 likes
  14. Nov 5

    Prop 8 protects workers, patients and stops dialysis companies from overcharging so we can bring down the cost of health care premiums for ALL of us. protects dialysis patients & demands big corporations put patients before profits. Vote Yes on Prop 8!

    2 retweets 4 likes
  15. 52 minutes ago

    Read more about how would make it more difficult for dialysis patients to access the life-sustaining care they need. That is one reason why the Los Angeles Times says to vote .

    1 like
  16. Nov 3
    Replying to and

    As described in the Blood Money doc on , DaVita has paid over $1BN in fines to the USG related to illegal kickback schemes & fraudulent MediCare billing practices. No wonder they can afford to spend nearly $100M to lie to voters about

    1 retweet 4 likes
  17. Oct 29

    The idea that would close dialysis centers down in retaliation for is so vile they should lose their medical licenses. Further, it’s a load of manure. Those centers are so obscenely, grossly profitable, they’ll never close them down.

    2 retweets 6 likes
  18. Nov 1
    Replying to

    Yes on is the only way to to protect people like and are only concerned with . I've seen those dumps they call clinics so clearly that revenue is not improving care

    1 retweet 3 likes
  19. Oct 28

    Medical experts in California agree that will dangerously risk dialysis patients’ lives by limiting access to dialysis care. Because of this, they urge everyone to vote .

    1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
  20. Nov 4

    Yes on logic from up close and personal... Thanks Joshua xo

    2 retweets 2 likes
  21. Nov 2

    Help keep patients like Sam safe by voting NO , the dangerous dialysis proposition.

    18 retweets 11 likes

No results.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.