How deep is the ocean?👀
Search timeline
#MH370 Both are great! 💞
Bob Ballard was ready! “I was first on the phone call to Australia, who was really controlling the shots there.
He apparently said that even without his assets used, he knows how to find things, but they said they didn’t need me.
1
2
4
Very late to it, but watching the. Channel 5 three part documentary on #MH370
Some guy saying ‘there’s little doubt the pilot depressurised the aircraft’ is where these things fall down. What evidence is there? The plane - nor any passengers - has been found!
3
1
8
I agree; not yet. China only acts in a proportionate manner. And when they know the outcome. e.g. #MH370 was a military incident & both US & China kept it quiet.
BUT; WW3 will not be started by either Russia or China; they don't need it! It will be started by WEF US
Quote Tweet
Does China Have the Guts to Enter into World War 3? ibankcoin.com/flyblog/?p=975 via @the_real_fly
1
#Wiki Look at this. Wiki has his obit up already, but still claims #MH370 ended up in the Southern Ocean. You can't buy comedy like this.
wsj.com/articles/u-s-c
1
2
#MH370 One of the lessons for future trackers is that we do not track flying objects the same way we track things on wheels or legs. Not if we have positioning information. This plane would remain missing if we followed the circumference of the final ping, because... 1/2
3
3
Replying to
I don't understand the question / issue. My response centered on what appears to me to be an intentional effort to ignore UN / ICAO requirements to formally close #MH370. Time will tell.
1
1
4. The BTO arc accuracy for R600 has a standard deviation of 63us, thus the 7th arc (00:19:29) could be up to 21 Nautical Miles in error.
The search at the 7th arc near 34S was not wide enough! #MH370
1
1
#MH370 I don't have first-hand information about the relationship between Fugro and ATSB, but I believe Fugro searched where ATSB told it to search. If true, I don't believe Fugro can be faulted for any of its work. There imagery it gathered was superb.
2
5
#MH370
Mr Chillit is totally illiterate about physics. The 7th arc radius should be 4920km. Mr Chillit has it WRONG. His geometrical constructs are just plain nonsense.
There is NO Telemetry, NO mirror satellite, NO orthogonal nonsense. These are just Chillit's delusions.
1
2
6
#MH370 The red arc is where the Inmarsat / ATSB estimate placed the circumference / radius of the final ping: about 4920 km: 101 km too far east. No chance at all. The Southern Ocean was way too far south; and "BFO", tragic.
1
2
6
Replying to
#MH370 It's a moot issue. It was visually confirmed in 2017. The telemetry is standard Eighth Grade stuff. You should write to Inmarsat, CSIRO, or Malaysia for confirmation. They won't reply, but you may feel better. Also: mikechillit.net/2022/07/13/mh3
1
Matrix already have glitch.
who own the chipset patents in the west?
😏 remember the crack down for the Japanese chipset company in 80s?
#mh370
An example of a transition zone about one-third of the way through the Wiki article on #MH370, Much of the article is a "British perspective". By that I mean Inmarsat, Thales, IG, etc. Unless they can find exceptions to Relativity or "The Standard Model" of physics.
2
4
Replying to
I see your illogical thinking.
To try & connect a crash site due south of Kuala Lumpur (departure airport) with the 7th arc, you’ve had to move the 7th arc.
However, a crash site is independent of the departure airport. Crashes don’t always occur due south of an airport 🤦🏽♂️ #MH370
#MH370 A normal investigation will not find mh because the records are corrupted.
4
3
#MH370 It appears that a preponderance of the Wikipedia article on this tragedy sticks to basic facts that have not changed. But that leaves about one-third of it that is just plain wrong. Corrections are needed to keep faith with readers of all ages; especially young readers.
1
4
Why do the top peeps insist that the unidentified 2:22 radar blip can only be #mh370? Surely it could have been another target?
1
2
Show this thread
