Search results
  1. 13 Oct 2013

    From Wired Science

    5 retweets
  2. 12 Oct 2013

    A response to censorship by Scientific American

    7 retweets 3 likes
  3. 12 Oct 2013

    And the story makes Business Insider: (via )

    22 retweets 6 likes
  4. 14 Oct 2013
    Replying to

    “: Here we go. ”

    1 reply 7 retweets 1 like
  5. 13 Oct 2013

    Excellent take from on the academic called a "whore" for refusing to write for free

    2 replies 19 retweets 12 likes
  6. 12 Oct 2013

    SciAm acts outrageously, and their defends them.

    6 retweets 3 likes
  7. 13 Oct 2013

    "Sorry if you were offended, lawyers made us do it, we'll talk later."

    5 retweets 2 likes
  8. 14 Oct 2013

    My contribution to "On the Benefits of 'Overreaction' "

    5 replies 11 retweets 9 likes
  9. 13 Oct 2013

    An editor's job is to have writers' backs. failed at that.

    4 retweets 3 likes
  10. 14 Oct 2013

    Biology-online has fired Ofek and sent a (weirdly informal) apology to "Danielle".

    2 replies 7 retweets 1 like
  11. 12 Oct 2013

    New post: We will not be silenced.

    1 reply 33 retweets 12 likes
  12. 14 Oct 2013

    Outrage among women in science over how colleague was treated and censored

    4 retweets 1 like
  13. 14 Oct 2013

    Now that her exchange with fired BiologyOnline editor is confirmed, important for 2 repost 's original post.

    8 retweets 1 like
  14. 12 Oct 2013

    This has been quite the week for righteous internet scientist rage: ?

    1 retweet 1 like
  15. 13 Oct 2013

    Where is apology from ? Don't forget original sexistracist slur snuck in private professional convo?

    2 replies 4 retweets 3 likes
  16. 14 Oct 2013

    Scientific American republishes Danielle Lee piece: . But how about a real apology for removing it?

    1 reply 7 retweets 3 likes
  17. 13 Oct 2013

    Storify re: by by

    7 retweets 2 likes
  18. 14 Oct 2013

    Good! BiologyOnline apologizes to and immediately fires editor who called her a "whore".

    12 retweets 1 like
  19. 12 Oct 2013

    Ohhh, excellent! RT For those unfamiliar with Scalzi's rant on writers asked to work for $0

    1 reply 12 retweets 5 likes
  20. 13 Oct 2013

    Perfect storm of sexism, racism, and the idea that people should be grateful to work for free.

    7 retweets 7 likes

No results.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.