Search results
  1. Dec 13

    Starting now: () & () are discussing the potential benefits and risks of . Watch live and submit your Qs w/ ->

  2. Dec 9

    Advances in AI have the potential to drive economic growth & improve our lives & also to cause great social, economic, and political harm. Join the discussion w/ of & to see how regulation will shape the ->

  3. Dec 14

    (1/2)AI is already everywhere! The current trajectory suggests that in the coming years, AI will only further augment human efforts.

  4. Dec 13
  5. Dec 13

    If used well, can bring huge improvements to society and the economy, says , but it is highly non-neutral - it could also create misery and huge power imbalances. Watch live ->

  6. Dec 14

    I am happy to be part of the panel discussion on 'Using Data and AI for Social Good' on December 15, 2021 from 2:00-3:00 PM (IST). If you have not registered you can do so at: and be a part of this discussion.

  7. Dec 13

    - In our tumultuous political economy - how should the States exercise their federated powers for AI? I have the dubious distinction of being the first and only one to submit a testimonial for Connecticut's first bill (it didn't pass) -

  8. Dec 13

    Very interesting & likely more so for folks w/more knowledge than me. "We already have many artificial subsidies for the bad use of AI ... we tax labor and subsidize capital. That means that a firm that decides to fire workers...could get an effective subsidy of 20%."

    Show this thread
  9. Dec 11

    The – along with all its potential social, economic, and political benefits and harms – is not set. Regulations will shape that path. & discuss what that regulation should look like. Register ->

  10. Dec 13

    "monitoring takes the form of not helping the workers but of completely robbing them of autonomy and making them work excessive hours." "monitored workers cannot ask for higher wages."😬 Also, provides examples of Amazon monitoring of employees, discusses consent

    Show this thread
  11. Dec 13

    - regulating can be a race to the bottom in federalism. States can have lax labor laws or less stringent health data regulations (e.g., "opt-out" default).

  12. Dec 13

    In closing, says the discourse has to change: the consequences of new tech are something we all should have a say in, not just those designing the algorithms. Thank you to Dr. Acemoglu for joining our event - Watch 👇

  13. Dec 13

    Absolutely agree Big Tech is more terrifying than Standard Oil. But what should be done? Nationality has become an irrelevancy to most modern corporations. suggests taxation predicated on market share. But what about regulation?Monopolization?

  14. Dec 13

    Is it possible to qualify why AI monitored employees are not able to ask for a raise from their employer and what steps should we as a society should make/take to ensure that the wellbeing of people remain at the forefront?

  15. Dec 15
  16. Dec 13

    Dr. Acemoglu falls into the trap of thinking of jobs as being binarily replaceable or not by AI. He fails to consider that many of the constituent tasks within jobs will inevitably, imminently, be replaced. And if you replace 90% of what an X does...

  17. Dec 13

    I'm an unapologetic fanboy of I disagree with him on enough to keep things interesting - but devoured each of his books. If you missed his talk today you missed a virtuoso performance!

  18. Dec 13

    The solution? We have to try to democratize decisions about the , says - more companies, more perspectives, more researchers, more diverse viewpoints have to be a part of that conversation.

    Show this thread
  19. Dec 10
  20. Dec 13

    Today at noon: Grab your lunch and join the conversation on the role of in the future of w/ & . Register -> Submit questions ->

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.