Stefano DellaVigna

@sdellavi

Behavioral economist at UC Berkeley and Co-director of Initiative in Behavioral Economics and Finance, Coeditor of the American Economic Review

Berkeley, CA
eml.berkeley.edu/~sdellavi
Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2014.
18 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @sdellavi

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @sdellavi

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. pro 2019.

    Piloting an approach for the Social Science Prediction Platform - can you forecast the results of these JDE Registered Reports? The first 100 people to take the survey who provide an academic email address have a 10% chance of a $50 reward.

    1 reply 14 proslijeđenih tweetova 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. 17. pro 2019.

    Completely agree

    Odgovor korisnicima @sdellavi @berkeleyecon
    It should be upload a letter ONLY. There’s no value to the rest of it anyway.
    3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. 17. pro 2019.

    RT this. Doing econ PhD applications for students is insane and as consequence most people I know have assistants do it for them. Places like UCLA ask ridiculous information that an assistant would not know and would drive faculty crazy. Glad is one of simplest.

    Could someone PLEASE make a Common Application for econ grad school? Or at least a JOE-like site? I only have 3 students applying, and the volume of email is just insane.
    22 proslijeđena tweeta 101 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. 23. stu 2019.

    Check out the great work of advisee Maxim Massenkoff on the JM. JMP is piece of "sociology and economics" in that it validates the sociological narrative of family "turning points" to lower crime. Larger impacts than any incentive-based intervention I know.

    What a sweet graph! It shows the propensity to commit a crime by women leading up to and after having a baby (~50% drop from pre to post). It’s a job market paper by Massenkoff and Rose at Berkeley. Hat tip:
    Prikaži ovu nit
    1 reply 21 proslijeđeni tweet 81 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. stu 2019.

    What is the problem of "obviousness" and can systematic predictions of research help solve it? Our latest article takes a look at the prediction platform launched by economists , , and ()

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. 10. stu 2019.

    I completely agree . Active discussion but aiming for constructive comments and no ad personam attacks. Not an easy balance to strike but important to aim for. In behavioral we are especially attuned to this because we used to be subject of attacks. Mostly no more!

    Odgovor korisniku/ci @sdellavi
    For one countervailing female opinion, I will say that I really prefer active discussion during the seminar - it is energizing - but it needs to be *constructive* ie not a standard-criticism-bingo game. That's the common problem (but only in the US, in my experience).
    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 28 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. 10. stu 2019.

    I think this is exactly right about the culture of interrupting speakers too much in economics. It is not good and hurts especially women. Put me among those that never liked this aspect of our culture. In our seminar we have always tried hard not to do that.

    Esther Duflo about the “in your face” seminar culture in economics: "It is not intentionally sexist, but it’s become sexist"
    6 replies 57 proslijeđenih tweetova 273 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. 1. stu 2019.

    Do you have a view on the impact of interventions by the Nudge Units? Take this survey to predict the impact from 241 nudge interventions. Results coming soon with !

    . & tested the impact of 241 nudges involving over 24 million participants (wow!). & compiled them & want *you* to give your best guess of what the average effect size was. I just did it & can't wait to know the results! ⬇️
    21 proslijeđeni tweet 55 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. 30. lis 2019.

    Check out our proposal on . Ask experts (& non-experts) to predict research results. Clarifies how much updating/surprise with a study, can reduce incidence of null results, and helps in experimental design. Ongoing work w/

    While the value of forecasts of research results is a newly emerging topic in , similar forecasts could also provide great benefits to research broadly and across disciplines, argues this . Read more: ($)
    25 proslijeđenih tweetova 82 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. lis 2019.

    Recently accepted by : “Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?” by Card, DellaVigna (), Funk, and Iriberri:

    1 reply 53 proslijeđena tweeta 117 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. 25. lis 2019.

    Thanks . All: Feel free to browse and download my PhD lectures on behavioral economics, send me an email if they are useful or you have comments / corrections

    Odgovor korisnicima @castrillon_dm @DinaPomeranz
    has wonderful lecture slides for behavioral economics posted online's for anyone to read:
    53 proslijeđena tweeta 242 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. lis 2019.

    Wouldn't it be great if you no longer need to speculate about whether your research results are surprising, but you could just show how surprising they are? Well, here's how to do it: by , , and in

    13 proslijeđenih tweetova 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. lis 2019.

    To improve the rigor and credibility of science, predicting the results (systematically collecting the views) before experiments are conducted may be useful by

    24 proslijeđena tweeta 31 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. 14. lis 2019.

    Esther is not just an amazing researcher. She also set incredible standards as founding editor at AEJ Applied, helping make AEJs the most important change in econ publishing in 25 yrs (since the Larry Katz era at QJE). Now she is attentive leader for us AER coeditors. So grateful

    Congratulations to AER editor Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee of and Michael Kremer of on winning the in Economic Sciences! Read more here:
    1 reply 21 proslijeđeni tweet 297 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. 29. ruj 2019.

    We have a similar finding in paper with published in 2018 JPE. Laypeople guess on average near perfectly which of 15 behavioral treatments are most effective. Accuracy similar to one of experts. Would be good to cite related work across disciplines!

    27 high-profile social science findings were evaluated by 233 people without a PhD. These laypeople predicted replication success above-chance (58%) When laypeople were informed about the strength of evidence from the original studies, this boosted prediction accuracy (67%)
    4 proslijeđena tweeta 49 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. 11. ruj 2019.

    This is how institutions collapse. Shame on politicians so partisan that they break all trust. Even Mitch McConnell, not exactly a centrist, would not come close to this. We hope at least.

    BREAKING: In an absolute stunner, calls surprise vote on morning of #9/11, override veto to pass budget with barely half of members present.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. 4. ruj 2019.

    What message do we give as economists if missing a Nobel prize is cause for depression? This loss saddens me in more ways than one. The hope is that we live in peace with our work, and are in touch with our family and friends. RIP

    “Colleagues said Professor Weitzman had grown increasingly despondent after being passed over for the Nobel Prize in economics last year and had left a note questioning whether he any longer had the mental acuity to contribute to his field.”
    9 replies 48 proslijeđenih tweetova 300 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 15. kol 2019.

    An argument for deception is that there is no way to run a study w/o it. Often there IS a way if one works hard at it. Great example is recent paper (coming out in AER) by , Corinne Low and Sullivan that does an audit style design for hiring but with no deception

    I agree with . I find this deception gratuitous. Any experimental or behavioral economist I know would not have run this study, in my mind. I think we need to have a very high bar for deception, including in audit studies.
    1 reply 8 proslijeđenih tweetova 47 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. 14. kol 2019.

    I agree with . I find this deception gratuitous. Any experimental or behavioral economist I know would not have run this study, in my mind. I think we need to have a very high bar for deception, including in audit studies.

    I thought deception was not an option in experimental economics.
    6 replies 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 50 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. 22. srp 2019.

    I support paternalistic policies such as soda taxes *when warranted*. But Berkeley city's move to ban natural gas from new buildings? Overreach! Read the take below by the great and pick a side you on this pivotal 2020 election issue. (God, I hope not)

    Outlawing Gas
    8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@sdellavi još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·