Academic inside baseball: I think we kinda figured out how to do a great lit review on any topic. 1-Pop on twitter and say "why aren't academics working on this?" 2-Build scraper to collect handles from angry replies, send suggested titles to Zotero. 3-... 4-Profit.
-
Show this thread
-
Also inside baseball to computer science: USNWR rankings did not take citations from proceedings into account?!?
Slightly amused that this happened to the discipline whose graduates build those effective metric engines that then put crazy videos to kids on YouTube but still...1 reply 1 retweet 28 likesShow this thread -
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Arvind Narayanan
zeynep tufekci added,
Arvind NarayananVerified account @random_walkerBased on Twitter reactions,@TheAshenLight has compiled a public, editable list of organizations & individuals working on Algorithmic Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nacNWHfq1B6SrOC_Dyd-R908qsANeTACG6FibLl9Jls … Thank you!! Go forth and edit! Let’s channel the energy productively
Show this thread2 replies 3 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Ryan Herr 🪕
Fine, fine, but that's about getting the right answer. Mine is called zeynep's lit review, so there. *sulks*https://twitter.com/rrherr/status/930596088121348096 …
zeynep tufekci added,
2 replies 1 retweet 28 likesShow this thread
no you're right, diff is real. it's the same mechanism for triggering responses, but Cunningham's deals with metaphysics; yours deals in epistemology
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.