@lachlan @scottlincicome Was referring to Scott's tweet. May have pressed Reply on wrong one.
-
-
En réponse à @alanbeattie
@alanbeattie@lachlan my pt was simply scientific consensus on the other eco-hysterias was wrong. Maybe hysteria is warranted now, or not2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@lachlan You think scientific consensus on loss of tropical rainforests has shifted? How?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @alanbeattie
@alanbeattie@lachlan no, I mean the consensus on planetary doom from said depletion. Or is that still a thing?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@lachlan See paper I just copied you.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
En réponse à @alanbeattie
@alanbeattie @lachlan "may alter growing conditions" is far different from "will destroy the planet in x years". We were/are fed the latter
08:04 - 25 mars 2015
0 réponse
0 Retweet
0 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?