@scottlincicome wait so you're categorically opposed to embargo as an instrument of foreign policy then?
-
-
-
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Why only if it's unilateral? Especially in the case of Cuba where we would otherwise exercise genuine market power?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LeonHWolf
@LeonHWolf umm, bc unilateral sanctions don't work?2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome "work" is a malleable word. The Castros don't have to flat out abdicate for us to say they "work"1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LeonHWolf
@LeonHWolf it's not just the castros. The course of the 20th century is littered with the failures of unilateral sanctions. See, Cheney1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome again, you're defining "failure" as "not completely fixing a problem" instead of "preventing a problem f/getting worse"1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LeonHWolf
@LeonHWolf And you're defining success as "restricting Americans' liberty and only stopping when they prove a negative"4 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome has had a profound economic effect even though unilateral. If not, Cuba wouldn't have been wholly dependent1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LeonHWolf
@LeonHWolf WHAT? That dependence ain't bc of the embargo. it's bc of full communism.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@LeonHWolf This is getting circular, and I must work. Later.
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?