@scottlincicome oh you have a soft spot for liberty and economics which is why you want the brutal cuban communist dictators propped up
-
-
En réponse à @LeonHWolf
@LeonHWolf But, hey, restricting Americans' freedom of travel and commerce is, like, totes ok, so whatever.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome wait so you're categorically opposed to embargo as an instrument of foreign policy then?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Why only if it's unilateral? Especially in the case of Cuba where we would otherwise exercise genuine market power?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LeonHWolf
@LeonHWolf umm, bc unilateral sanctions don't work?2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome "work" is a malleable word. The Castros don't have to flat out abdicate for us to say they "work"1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LeonHWolf
@LeonHWolf it's not just the castros. The course of the 20th century is littered with the failures of unilateral sanctions. See, Cheney1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome again, you're defining "failure" as "not completely fixing a problem" instead of "preventing a problem f/getting worse"1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LeonHWolf
@LeonHWolf And you're defining success as "restricting Americans' liberty and only stopping when they prove a negative"4 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@LeonHWolf The presumption is liberty. The state must make its case. That case, once valid, no longer is. Fin. Now, I must work.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?