@scottlincicome No disagreement with the fundamental endorsement of TPA. Still huge problems with the ridiculous opacity of TPP negotiation.
-
-
En réponse à @GaltsGirl
@GaltsGirl as we say in the article, it's a legit issue - one that can be addressed (in pt) in TPA!2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Difficult to get behind the idea that I should unwittingly support that gov't is gonna negotiate in [my] best interest.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @GaltsGirl
@GaltsGirl You don't have to - let other countries (and basic FTA rules) do that. Plus congr input/mandates/approval2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome LOL that's still asking me to trust that Congress is gonna act in my best interest. They have a terrible approval rating :P1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @GaltsGirl
@GaltsGirl not on FTAs, amazingly. NAFTA, KORUS, etc all achieved a LOT of mkt liberalization. Not perfect, but better!1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Wow, how do you even type "NAFTA" without being smote by the interwebz trollerati?1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome HAHAHA! Lucky you! They spend half the day arguing new regulatory authority while muttering *freedom!*1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@GaltsGirl sounds abt right.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?