@GaltsGirl nah, it's perfectly legal and constitutional and has been repeatedly proven as such by guys like Bork, Meese, etc
-
-
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Not saying that it isn't. Just saying that I don't particularly support it in this case. I'm still debating COOL.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @GaltsGirl
@GaltsGirl COOL is a protectionist abomination. TPA is fine, tho reciprocal FTAs are less-than-ideal, as I argue here http://thefederalist.com/2013/10/31/americas-horrible-good-messed-trade-policy-fix/ …1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome I have a whole bunch of farmers who nee to be convinced that preventing markets isn't how you improve theirs.1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
-
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome *grumble* It's pretty tough to convince them to sit tight and trust that Big O will negotiate an agreement that helps them.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @GaltsGirl
@GaltsGirl I understand that fear, but that's a substantive concern. Congress can still vote "no" if the deal sucks.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome You're talking about people who have a history of not reading things before they pass them. These farmers know it.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @GaltsGirl
@GaltsGirl but the alternative is... Current protectionism.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome I know... they are farmers first. Small, family farms already fighting regulatory hell at all levels. Not all libertarian.3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@GaltsGirl understood. The fight shld be against the regulatory state, not agreements that, overall, remove govt. Recall: status quo is BAD
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?