@gabrielmalor I think we're talking abt 2 diff things. 1) of course there's a racial element; but 2) it's legit to criticize "dems"...
-
-
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome It becomes even more troubling in a situation like this, where skin color is the most obvious proxy for party ID.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @gabrielmalor
@gabrielmalor so, if a pol receives word of illegal electioneering targeting a certain race, he can't do anything abt it?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Illegal? What was illegal? It's an open primary.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @gabrielmalor
@gabrielmalor as I understand MS law, you can't vote in the GOP runoff if you voted D primary or plan to vote for D in final. Is that wrong?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome The first part is true, the second has been knocked down by the courts every time anyone has tried to enforce it.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @gabrielmalor
@gabrielmalor but not the MS law specifically. So it's technically still the law. So McD was calling for people to help enforce the laws2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Very few people (almost none) have an obligation to comply with an unconstitutional law.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @gabrielmalor
@gabrielmalor sure. But if it's still on the books, it seems a bit much to impugn someone citing it.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Well, now you're just quibbling over degree. Was it "a bit much" or "just about right"? Bah.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@gabrielmalor I was trying to be nice. Seemed impolite to say "effing absurd".
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?