Some cons creatively re-defininig "redistribution", "tax cut" & "investment" i/o to push their preferred social policies - v familiar tactic
-
-
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome What would you call eliminating marriage penalty? Cut? Reform? Fix? Not redistribution to marrieds, right?3 réponses 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ConnollyDC
@ConnollyDC the diff being eliminating a layer of govt distortion as opposed to adding another layer to offset a previous one1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome But if there is a “previous” distortion in the case of parents vis sr. entitlements, it warrants fixing, right?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ConnollyDC
@ConnollyDC by fixing the entitlements or, if that's not possible, eliminating other govt distortions (incl actually cutting taxes for all)4 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@ConnollyDC if there's a fiscal bias against parents, cutting taxes for all w/out regarding to parenting maintains the bias.1 réponse 1 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @BobStein_FT
@BobStein_FT@ConnollyDC gotta tend to family now, but not true if policy changes affect consumption (bc fams consume more). more Later.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@BobStein_FT Interesting… look forward to it.11 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@ConnollyDC @BobStein_FT a) any policy that eliminates regressive consumption taxes will disproportionately benefit fams, esp big ones
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?