Some cons creatively re-defininig "redistribution", "tax cut" & "investment" i/o to push their preferred social policies - v familiar tactic
-
-
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome What would you call eliminating marriage penalty? Cut? Reform? Fix? Not redistribution to marrieds, right?3 réponses 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ConnollyDC
@ConnollyDC the diff being eliminating a layer of govt distortion as opposed to adding another layer to offset a previous one1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome But if there is a “previous” distortion in the case of parents vis sr. entitlements, it warrants fixing, right?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @ConnollyDC
@ConnollyDC by fixing the entitlements or, if that's not possible, eliminating other govt distortions (incl actually cutting taxes for all)4 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@ConnollyDC if there's a fiscal bias against parents, cutting taxes for all w/out regarding to parenting maintains the bias.1 réponse 1 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @BobStein_FT
@BobStein_FT@ConnollyDC gotta tend to family now, but not true if policy changes affect consumption (bc fams consume more). more Later.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@BobStein_FT Interesting… look forward to it.11 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
@ConnollyDC @BobStein_FT 4) GOP reform policy shld seek to correct the current problem. Now, where we disagree is in how to do it....
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?