@scottlincicome @TheStalwart People are losing jobs, losing coverage, getting their family budgets wrecked.
-
-
En réponse à @baseballcrank
@baseballcrank@scottlincicome That's the case under the existing healthcare system, too. So the question is: which is better long-term.3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheStalwart
@TheStalwart nonsense. The govt is ill-equipped and not legally authorized to make such decisions.@baseballcrank1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@baseballcrank Now you're arguing something else, Scott.2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheStalwart
@TheStalwart@scottlincicome All part of the same problem. Complex systems cannot be managed well by technocrats. Why we have markets.4 réponses 1 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @baseballcrank
@baseballcrank@scottlincicome My point is. Must one judge a policy endeavor by short-term effects? Very odd framing, IMO.3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheStalwart
@TheStalwart@scottlincicome These are permanent features of the system.4 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @baseballcrank
@baseballcrank@scottlincicome In fact, it's hard to think of any possible law that wouldn't cause some short-term pain to people.1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @TheStalwart
@TheStalwart@baseballcrank of course, but the difference is govt-caused pain or market-caused pain (ie removal of govt interference)3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@baseballcrank What about a new road that disrupts existing businesses, but creates long-term growth in an area?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@TheStalwart @baseballcrank if the existing business is given fair market value for the interference, fine. This is the law
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?