Why say "could" and "critics say" when everyone agrees this is true? Some things are actual facts. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/plans-to-increase-exports-of-liquefied-natural-gas-could-accelerate-fracking-boom-critics-say/2013/05/12/a758abe8-bae0-11e2-b537-ab47f0325f7c_story.html …
-
-
En réponse à @saeverley
@saeverley@levi_m@Ed_Crooks U shldn't have to justify anything. We call it "free market capitalism": no govt permission needed to buy/sell2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@saeverley@levi_m Not that I need to convince you of that, of course. We need an anti-export voice in this discussion1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @Ed_Crooks
@Ed_Crooks ha. "Need" might be a tad strong.@saeverley@levi_m1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome@saeverley@levi_m "Need" to get a debate going. More congenial but less interesting if we all just agree with each other1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@Ed_Crooks you journalists and your need to air both sides. We idealists see no such need. ;-) @saeverley @levi_m
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?