Why say "could" and "critics say" when everyone agrees this is true? Some things are actual facts. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/plans-to-increase-exports-of-liquefied-natural-gas-could-accelerate-fracking-boom-critics-say/2013/05/12/a758abe8-bae0-11e2-b537-ab47f0325f7c_story.html …
@levi_m but I agree: technically they're minerals, but no difference as far as WTO's concerned (unless u raise natsec) @saeverley @Ed_Crooks
-
-
@scottlincicome@saeverley@ed_crooks my understanding is may be difference between US, Chinese obligations due to WTO accession specifics -
@levi_m yes, that is definitely a difference - China's accession protocol is "WTO plus" (1/2)@saeverley@Ed_Crooks
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
@scottlincicome@saeverley@ed_crooks also some dif b/c not clear if LNG is raw or manufactured good. -
@levi_m that won't matter under WTO rules and Art XI. A good is a good is a good.@saeverley@Ed_Crooks
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?