Why say "could" and "critics say" when everyone agrees this is true? Some things are actual facts. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/plans-to-increase-exports-of-liquefied-natural-gas-could-accelerate-fracking-boom-critics-say/2013/05/12/a758abe8-bae0-11e2-b537-ab47f0325f7c_story.html …
@levi_m oh, I agree (and wrote as much). I meant "pro-export" rebuttal to the "export flood / skyrocketing price" arg @Ed_Crooks @saeverley
-
-
@scottlincicome@ed_crooks@saeverley ah. I think main arg there is that liquefaction/transport/regas cost will impose limits -
@levi_m yep. That's def the main limit short-term, then new global supply adds another limit longer-term@Ed_Crooks@saeverley
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?