100% agree RT @ezraklein: Someone should start a rigorous meta-fact check site that fact checks the fact checkers. Need more accountability.
-
-
En réponse à @bdomenech
@bdomenech@ezraklein it's a much-needed (and likely lucrative) service, but who has the credibility?1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome I envision a balanced board of wonks. Or just Richard Foster dining alone.@ezraklein1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @bdomenech
@bdomenech assuming Foster can't be bothered, I wonder if the wonks would be willing to do it (and aren't also saddled w bias)@ezraklein1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome Right picks would make it work. Orszag and Holtz-Eakin can balance out.@ezraklein1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @bdomenech
@bdomenech and you cld do a livefeed of their deliberations. High-nerd entertainment@ezraklein1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @scottlincicome
@scottlincicome YES. Brian Lamb could moderate. 150 very engaged viewers.@ezraklein1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
@bdomenech ...all of whom think THEY know better than the deliberating wonks @ezraklein
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
RTS. You didn't read the article, did you?