"Wind and solar power generators wait in yearslong bureaucratic lines to connect to the power grid, only to be faced with fees they can't afford, forcing them to scramble for more money or pull out of projects completely."
"One GOP stance Cotham has fully embraced is school choice. On Wednesday she expressed support for sending more taxpayer dollars to private schools to give students and parents more options." cc
"Reality Check: How Influential Is China Right Now?
China looms large in the global-superpower discussion, but it’s not nearly as powerful as its leaders would like you to think." https://trib.al/Tecf3ac
Fueled by TikTok and Korean entertainment, bubble tea has become so popular in the US that tapioca pearls — the chewy balls the drink is famous for — are now the country's top food import from Taiwan. https://trib.al/BLTWtum
I hope the “American Economic Liberties Project” former hotel reviewer gets right on critiquing it. Amazing how stupid the public policy debate has gotten in the last few years.
This is the most California story ever:
To 'help' the housing crisis, they budgeted $300M to pay for first time home buyers' down payments.
In less than two weeks, they've run out of money and only helped 2300 people.
300 Million Dollars, 2300 people helped
So, sure, these transactions/holdings involve "adversaries," BUT that condition's hardly a sufficient check on potential EB abuse on "natsec" grounds - ABUSE WE LITERALLY JUST SAW DURING THE TRUMP YEARS (re 232 & IEEPA).
So spare me the "libertarians are at it again" nonsense.
Yes. And it's not just the "any risk" language. It's other ambiguous/weasel terms like "arising from" and "decide important matters affecting," the lack of congressional/judicial review, and so on....
There’s been some debate about the RESTRICT Act today. I think this point is very important, especially agencies not leaving power on the table. Like, one of the biggest issues in environmental policy right now is the EPA unilaterally redefining the term “navigable waterway.” twitter.com/megbrownlawyer…
"The ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach have closed due to widespread worker shortages apparently linked to ongoing contract talks." https://abc7.com/port-of-los-angeles-long-beach-worker-shortage-ilwu-local-13/13099678/…
et al, but I wonder: if the firms exploiting political connections didn’t do so would it be worse for all firms? IOW, rent extractors gonna extract rents. Maybe those paying provide a positive externality >than the observed costs. 🧵1/
"Connecting to Power: Political Connections, Innovation, and Firm Dynamics" https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3982/ECTA18338#.ZDGHp3l0098.twitter…
"market leaders are much more likely to be politically connected, but much less likely to innovate...."
Anyway congratulations on the new robot jobs. "if you did a power tool assembly in China or Mexico, you might have 50 to 75 people on a line...the [U.S.] 2.0 version looks like it’s going to get down to two to three people on the line.”
They are garbage trees. They have shallow roots and they can heave up even in very little wind. And when they do fall down, you can’t even burn the wood in your fireplace and they have to be hauled away. Crap.
There are serious risks posed by China that warrant serious government responses.
But our current moment is also revealing a lot of unserious, or even dangerous, moves that raise a different risk—overreaction by our government.
"Does a firm’s lobbying activity respond to its peers’ lobbying activity?" https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-022-01033-w…
"firms increase their lobbying as their peers increase their lobbying. Such positive effects are stronger for larger firms and firms in more regulated industries."
"Political connections relate to a higher rate of survival, as well as growth in employment and revenues, but not in productivity... At the aggregate level, gains from political connections do not offset losses stemming from lower reallocation and growth."