It's in the way communication is regulated from my understanding. You can be like the phone company, where you can't be held liable and take no responsibility for content, or like a publisher where you can be held liable, and take all responsibility for content.
This article has some links to court cases involving this topic.https://www.city-journal.org/html/platform-or-publisher-15888.html …
-
-
I linked the piece for the references in it, but it was written by a former FCC lawyer. They're the ones claiming they need Section 230 protection to protect free speech, then arbitrarily removing content, which goes against the concept of free speech.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.