There's a historical precedent for a non-fiat global reserve currency. There's NO historical precedent for companies issuing unique tokens to pay for service/goods. Burden of proof isn't on Bitcoiners, burden of proof is on tokenizers. They're scammers until proven otherwise.
Agree, but speculative value is not inherent to tokens. I think there are a number of assets where tokenization makes sense, but you'd want it as immutable and censor resistant as possible; and there's no need to attached a half-assed currency to it. Ie. build it on top of btc.