There's a historical precedent for a non-fiat global reserve currency. There's NO historical precedent for companies issuing unique tokens to pay for service/goods. Burden of proof isn't on Bitcoiners, burden of proof is on tokenizers. They're scammers until proven otherwise.
-
-
Chips in casinos are always (afaik) denominated in a fiat currency. They don't have floating speculative value like 'tokens'
-
Agree, but speculative value is not inherent to tokens. I think there are a number of assets where tokenization makes sense, but you'd want it as immutable and censor resistant as possible; and there's no need to attached a half-assed currency to it. Ie. build it on top of btc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because of small blocks. All of these can built on BCH however.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.