Not a fan of this talk. Completely ignores that technology changes bring structural changes. Assumes 2010s corpo culture to be immutable and everlasting when it’s the first thing to change, far before mass obsolescence #clojuresync
-
Show this thread
-
Prescriptions are fine, but reasoning/justification is a let-down, especially given the framing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @sbelak
The talk makes good points but there are some things I would approach differently. 1. The criticisms run into some problematic intersections with "the spectrum" so to speak. Yes that sort of intelligence is over-celebrated so a certain amount of pushback is healthy and valuable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
2. The trends of automation need to be understood on dimensions of attentional scalability, labor scalability, and scalability of social organization. The latter is where we'll find the most common ground between interesting technical and social challenges.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It's not a social/technical dichotomy but rather a technical problem of coordination at scale. Human intelligence amplification is the narrative to pursue here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Exactly! And tracing structural changes this will cause.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.