About as much as the Greek Atomists are the ultimate source of modern physics.
-
-
Replying to @sbelak
You don't think that there's a more, err, close continuity between Gödel & Turing than Democritus & Newton?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus
Sure, but calling Goedel or Turing analytic philosophers is quite a stretch, especially if you are at the same time pedantic and insist Nietzsche was not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sbelak
Where, in your opinion, is the line between analytic philosophy & say, modal logic?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus
Neither Turing nor Goedel did modal logic, and it's not a very interesting distinction, but to not dodge the question: if it's based on (uses language and rules of) topology, mathematical logic, or abstract algebra, it's math.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sbelak
I see you've snuck the word mathematical before logic. The point isnt that Turing & Gödel were doing modal logic, the point is that the substructure of mathematics is philosophical- & that THIS is the purest form of philosophy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus
I can see why you dislike Nietzsche though, he's denouncing precisely this glorious "pure" past to which we can never return.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus @sbelak
& this is also silly considering N's goal was to recreate presocratic philosophy- a goal heidegger took up as well etc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus
Do a degree. But not as an immutable ideal, but rather returning to the point where we went astray, to make new thought.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
*to a degree (sorry, this typo came out super patronizing)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.