so perhaps some things that you wouldn't express in Haskell types?
definitely. PL is a tool for thought and clj helps me think better than anything else I've found
-
-
Haskell's pretty good for this too, but there's _much_ more to learn and it rewards investment.
-
Agree. I wonder if I haven't put in enough time or is clj simply a better match for how I approach problems.
-
and then there is of course the "tools works on both ends" thing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


