@ambrosebs Lisps. Elm, maybe? Smalltalk? Newspeak?
-
-
@sbelak@ctford@ambrosebs That was my first thought too, but may not apply depending on the definition of 'atomic'. -
@sbelak@ctford@ambrosebs Forth is incredibly simple, but composition isn't straightforward. Namespaces, if they exist, are handmade. -
@ctford@sbelak@ambrosebs I haven't learned enough J, Smalltalk, or Newspeak to have an opinion on them. -
@ctford@sbelak@ambrosebs I'd nominate languages like Lisp that don't deviate far from lambda calculi, and avoid redundant features. -
@ctford@sbelak@ambrosebs Beyond that it's a debate about how much expressive power you need. E.g. in some contexts Coq is a contender.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.