by homoiconic I don't mean lisp, it's too explicit/anal about structure in same way java is too e/a about class/type declarations #infermore
-
-
@sbelak lisp's eval dialect#orhowdoucallit requires you to be more explicit (- (+ 10 10) 5); Forth: 10 10 + 5 - ; Rebol: - + 10 10 5 -
@sbelak at forth and rebol eval structure is infered through what the functions take, at lisp it's stated by () indep. of functions
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sbelak as with OCaml types are most of the times infered througs what functions take, at Java they are explicitly given by prog. in codeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sbelak the explicit structure/types are basically a defense mechanism & they have it's use, but they also limit and are better as optionalThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.