and while I'm twyping... is a metaphysics (heard for it this week) just trying to define the tao, the un-definable by default? @sbelak
@refaktor no. It's a study of how things are. What is thingness in the first place. What exists & what doesn't. What are modes of existence.
-
-
@sbelak can you study the "thingness in the first place" or is that lvls below "study", as exploring how its to be a fish from a satellite? -
@refaktor it's study about as much as string theory is a study of fabric of reality or non-constructive proofs are mathematics. -
@sbelak can I respond tomorrow w/ H. Bergson's example, which is where I heard of metaphysics, or do you feel I'm just trolling? -
@refaktor keep in mind metaphysics is a term with >2500 years of history (& baggage), it means different things to different people. -
@sbelak da zaprem ta thread. če je metafizika izraz ki pomeni različne stvari, potem ni smiselno, da debatiram kaj je metafizika (substanca) -
@sbelak lahko bi edino debatiral npr. da je Bergsonova metafizika (oz to kar on razume in opisuje pod metafizika) nekaj -
@refaktor bolj je poanta, da ne moreš iz enega avtorja sklepat na celo polje. -
@sbelak strinjam a me je pritegnl ravno on ker je videt lociral in skuša definirat tisto kar zen definira le z negacijo in tao niti ne skuša
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.