There's the problem, having the arrogance to "organize for Bitcoin."
The problem is that the more outspoken proponents band together (thereby amplifying and homogenizing their voce), the less the ecosystem is permissionless on the social level.
-
-
Permissionless on a social level? That's either not a thing, or a thing we have no control over.
-
UASF was very much a thing. Thankfully nobody has full control, but you can make it worse, or not. So far the community rejected too strong movements in this direction (BCH split and now a more extreme version of same in CWS's SV split), but it only takes 1 (adversary asymmetry)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.