Here’s a shocker: “the new rule exemplifies how Trump has dismissed or marginalized scientific evidence. A government advisory board of scientists, many of whom were handpicked by the Trump administration, wrote that the proposed water rule “neglects established science.”
One of the risks in conducting something as consequential as an impeachment hearing, things like this happen in the proverbial dark of night. Trump once again, demonstrates his commitment to the environment, that is, to destroy it.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/22/climate/trump-environment-water.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
More: “The Obama rule protected about 60 percent of the nation’s waterways, including large bodies of water such as the Chesapeake Bay, Mississippi River and Puget Sound, and smaller headwaters, wetlands, seasonal streams and streams that run temporarily underground.”
Prikaži ovu nit -
“It limited the discharge of pollutants such as fertilizers, pesticides and industrial chemicals into those waters.”
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.