sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 20178/ 1 more reason: businesses today largely have structured or text data, not images, voice. NLU is the least far along of those 3 AI domains61882
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 20179/ Of course, companies can (and should) certainly set out to capture more voice/images and progress NLP research3119
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 201710/ This of course doesn't apply to some industries that DO rely heavily on images (e.g. radiology). But today that's a smallish subset120
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 201711/ RPA is NOT AI. It's fragile, hard to deploy, rules-based process automation tech based on GUI-level integration. More on this later...3421
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 201712/ Most execs have very little understanding of how to "apply AI" today51142
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 201712/ This is unsurprising: they are caught between the tech industry's "magic cognitive AI does everything" hype marketing...2332
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 201713/... and of course not having the technical understanding to identify labeled datasets/decisioning opportunities for supervised learning3137
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 201714/ AI-enabled consumer products are making much, much faster progress so far, delivering new UX to consumers who are voice and photo-first3340
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 201715/ I'm optimistic we can do much better than this over the next few years as we get to the slightly less obvious ideas...1119
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 201716/... and there is more crossover between people who understand domain problems, workflow, modern ML and product3133
sarah guo @saranormousReplying to @saranormous @shivon and @jamescham17/ End musings! Side note: check out @AndrewYNg's HBR article on what AI can and can't do right now: https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-artificial-intelligence-can-and-cant-do-right-now…3:58 AM · Apr 27, 2017·Twitter Web Client17 Retweets85 Likes
sarah guo @saranormous·Apr 27, 2017Replying to @saranormous @shivon and 2 othersughhhh if I were a bot, I might be shit at interacting, but at least I wouldn't have numbered my thread 12/ 12/ 😣6140
agibsonccc@agibsonccc·Apr 27, 2017As a founder on this "map" I agree. Most teams are founded by scientists with zero clue on what "sales" or "applications" are ;/17
Rick Zullo@Rick_Zullo·Apr 27, 2017Replying to @saranormous @shivon and 2 othersVery solid tweet storm on AI in enterprise via @saranormous
Nick Mehta@nrmehta·Apr 27, 2017Replying to @saranormous @shivon and 2 othersTotally agree - BTW @ttunguz wrote something I concurred with on this: http://tomtunguz.com/when-ml-isnt-enough/…
Broomstick Rocket@TrampolinRocket·Apr 27, 2017Replying to @saranormous @shivon and 2 othersAnswer: Serious AI apps today depend on intensively application-specific deep learning neural net models. That's hard part / secret sauce.
Keith Bigelow @keithbigelow·Apr 27, 2017Replying to @saranormous @shivon and 2 othersHey Sarah, love the storm. Seems like you're asserting: AI = Feature AI <> Product
Iddo@greental·May 6, 2017Replying to @saranormous @shivon and 2 othersThis is exactly how the role of a data scientist in the enterprise should bridge between the applications the data and the algorithms