2. The NHS has made recommendations to Parliament & to Govt on the legislative changes it needs, after an extensive consultation & having worked alongside the cross party @CommonsHealth select committee which also took evidence & reported https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmhealth/2000/200002.htm …
-
-
Show this thread
-
3.
@UKLabour plans are ideologically driven & would not be welcomed by the NHS. They would cause major disruption when the main asks can be achieved in the ways they have set out in their report. This has widespread support from their workforce & those working alongside themShow this thread -
Here are the opening key asks from the NHS on future legislation. All political parties should be listening to what the people who lead and work in our NHS have to say, including
@UKLabour . These include scrapping section75. Evidence matters more than rigid ideologypic.twitter.com/UXeqIqTkYM
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Once a Tory always a Tory!
-
Once an NHS doctor who puts patients interests first, always an NHS doctor who puts patients interests first, more like.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Abstaining is not doing your job
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This angry tweet has guilt written all over it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m so sorry but nobody is asking for more NHS privatisation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here we go.. It's Corbyn's fault...
-
Actually nobody's saying it's Corbyn's fault, but Labour knew LibDems had already said they would abstain on the Queen's speech. The amendment had no legislative effect (it's a "regret" amendment), and was a stunt to give Labour a manufactured excuse to kick the LibDems.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.