The job post links to a blog article whose author has a distinctive name. To LinkedIn! Sure enough, "Software Engineer at YCombinator."
-
-
...no one with chronic illness, no one taking care of an extended family, and certainly no one whose brain just likes more variety.
-
And then there's the second sentence. "You should have worked at or started a startup."
-
YC estimates their applicant pool (remember, 13% women, 12% Black or Latino), is actually MORE diverse than startup founders in general.
-
The pool of people who have started a startup is pretty male & pretty white. EVEN MORE than YC itself - already really male & really white.
-
As for "worked at a startup," I will note that if you won't accidentally get pregnant, it's way safer to risk shitty insurance for a while.
-
(As an aside: this means Peter Thiel, in helping elect POTUS, actively took steps to make sure startups would stay young, white, & male.)
-
Buuuuut that's neither here nor there. Or is it? Would you want to work for a company in which someone like that was a partner?
-
Anyway. Back to the job post. They spend 2 paragraphs describing their tech, which is 2 more paragraphs than they spend describing the team.
-
Then it's on to benefits, where the only tangible one called out specifically is "equity in YC."pic.twitter.com/i5cpBiThPW
-
Hello! Many women would like to know if you offer the shitty insurance that will mean they go bankrupt if they get pregnant, or not. Thanks.
-
Well. That's the whole job post! There's still the application form, but I'll leave identifying those issues as an exercise for the reader.

-
In summary: No "crunk" or "crushing code" in a job post is a good start, but isn't sufficient. Don't be cute with titles. (1/2)
-
Tell us about the company, team, & office. Include pictures. Don't use the code words for "young white dudes" - we're on to you. (2/3)
-
Be specific about benefits, ESPECIALLY healthcare if you're in the US. And don't make fascists into partners. (3/3)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In that context "passion" probably does mean those things. But does it always? Can it mean deep interest/motivation in software engineering?
-
Underneath, people mean that, but they determine whether you have it by examining markers like free time open source which don't correlate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I also feel like women are more often described as "passionate" about things that are seen as hobbies, or frivolous, or fluffy.
-
I'm careful not to describe myself as "passionate" about my work as a composer, because that makes it sound like a hobby/sideline.
-
Super interesting observation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Everything else you analyzed and explained was
, thanks for sharing it. -
They forgot "Ninja".
-
Blessing in disguise that they don't want anyone but young, white guys. Women don't fare well in these environments.
-
As someone with judgement, experience, maturity...a life...while I WANT to fight all the good fights, it's exhausting.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.