[cw: child sexual assault] Heh, well, as long as we’re going for “technically correct”... You’re right. “All” Stallman did was defend Marvin Minsky’s rape of a 16-year-old girl. Said rape was facilitated by Epstein, so in defending it, he indirectly defended Epstein’s actions.https://twitter.com/dexter002400/status/1176136689070137344 …
-
-
Let’s assume, for a minute, that the rape never happened. It’s STILL morally repugnant to defend the idea of Minsky, an old man, having sex with (i.e., raping) a 16-year-old girl.
Show this thread -
“Sometimes it’s ok for an old man to rape a 16-year-old girl” is not a position that anyone with any power should hold. Full stop. End of story ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Show this thread -
Dear Stallman defenders, You can try that nitpicking bullshit on me if you like, but know that my “technically correct” will _always_ run circles around yours. Love, Sarah
Show this thread -
Funny how Stallman dudes REALLY want to nitpick legalities and word choice...right up until I point out that Minsky having sex with a 16-year-old girl is legally rape, no matter how “willing” (ew) she appeared. Then all of a sudden everything can be fudged


Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Twitter at the speed of parenting