It continues: ”Most importantly, we cannot support anyone, directly or indirectly, who condones the endangerment of vulnerable people by rationalizing any part of _predator_ behavior.” (emphasis mine) That’s an important word to have in this discussion.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Worth reading the whole thing. Aligning social justice with software freedom is not an approach I’ve seen officially before.https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/ …
Show this thread -
Just in: the GNOME Foundation joins the call to
#cancelstallman. https://blog.halon.org.uk/2019/09/gnome-foundation-relationship-gnu-fsf/ …Show this thread -
"One of the GNOME Foundation’s strategic goals is to be an exemplary community in terms of diversity & inclusion. I feel we can’t continue to have a formal association with the FSF or the GNU project when its main voice in the world is saying things that hurt this aim."
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems Stallman's cult is determined to awkwardly copypaste their way to victoryhttps://twitter.com/michielsikma/status/1173711886497525766 …
-
Also who came up with that sentence?! You’d think they were getting paid by the syllable

-
what, even, does any of that mean?
-
I don't know, what is an octagonal comment anyway
pic.twitter.com/gy4h5RNrHI
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Twitter at the speed of parenting