Some points are subtle and take a lot of words to explain well. You can't tl;dr subtlety. Also, code has multiple paths and this thread has only one: statement; statement; statement; etc
-
-
RMS has a great quote about how Conway’s law works, but I don’t use it anymore in my presentations, because I found equally smart comparisons made by better people. The ones I found avoid the “ew, RMS” reaction that many people have, which make them quite simply more convincing.
-
Ok, I understand a lot better now. You're totally right. I'm sad, though, because "on the Internet nobody can hear you being subtle" is a great way of expressing that idea. And I feel like saying it unattributed may seem like I'm passing it off as my own.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's a good point. Human beings are very associative in their thinking. I should have asterisked it with "this tweet does not endorse everything Linux has ever said or done"?
-
It may be preferable to quote another source. "Brevity is the soul of wit," for instance.
-
We're discussing effective communication practices and it seems reasonable that Shakespeare is a better source to cite than Torvalds.
-
But there are no easy answers. Sensitivity and emotional intelligence aren't things that can be won at by applying rigorous logic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Twitter at the speed of parenting