Sarah MeiVerified account

And besides, even if the organization capitulates based on your ability to defend the moral high ground - it doesn’t actually fix the root issue.

To actually fix it, you need to negotiate with the individuals who are applying the pressure. You need to understand THEIR incentives, and align your desired changes with those. You don’t want begrudging acceptance. You want enthusiastic buy-in.

If you can’t get that, then it’s highly unlikely that your hoarded codebase will ever improve. Your ability to write good code is thus quite literally constrained by your ability to communicate with other humans.

It’s not as impossible as it sounds. On the surface it might look like your manager’s desires (i.e. for you finish features faster by skipping the small refactorings) are diametrically opposed to yours.

But there’s almost always a win-win in there SOMEWHERE. You can start by trying to understand what is driving that desire for them. It might not be what you think.

It could be pressure from above, or a positive reputation that they want to preserve, or that they really need their full bonus this year because they already put a nonrefundable down payment on a swimming pool.

Humans are complicated systems. They operate under a constantly- shifting set of motivations - many of which they are not consciously aware of. But as you improve your communication skills (by doing it badly at first), you start to get a sense of what works for different people.

No matter how you approach it - by staking out the moral high ground, negotiation, subterfuge, or some combination - changing the incentives you operate under, and the habits those incentives create, is HARD. And sometimes it’s not possible.