Is there a reason why in that entire article the writer does not namecheck you and/or your work? Find it really odd that *the* definitive text on this issue is not cited at all. Is it just a lack of basic research or a weird refusal to recognise your contribution to the debate?
like i genuinely don't mean this snarkily, i just wasnt aware and most of my research came from just, like, the years of amazon being infamously bad. we got invited to go do this, me and like 20 people. wasn't like my idea to go check it out so to speak
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I was surprised too. Not expecting the writer to know, but it's really surprising that no one in editorial got the connection either. Is the staggers a self-service publisher these days?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.