MCV 30 Under 30 2021 
Spicy take: ... Danaerys was never set up to be a goodie/hero, and if you thought her character was going in any other direction, you haven’t been paying attention.
-
i think the main issue is 1) speed with which it happens 2) daenerys was always foreshadowed to be bloodthirsty, but she cared about who she saw as her people. slaughtering traitors and competitors made sense, killing innocents doesn’t.
I agree re: acceleration, but she has been threatening to burn cities to the ground for a very long time if rulers did not comply, which would imply the death of civilians. I think the people of KL represent Cersei, to her, and so they’ve taken on her hatred.
-
-
Which is fairly common with mental illness, to attach feelings by association. They represent the theft of everything she’s lost. Its still quite the jump, but that’s how I would argue it. Also, I don’t think it was ever about the people she purported to care for...
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
that would make sense, i guess it’s just communicated awfully. i do really hate how the bells of surrender set her off, though :/ i think they could’ve had her get high off the power and give her an ep or two of being a tyrannical queen. but d&d refused 10 eps so RIP
-
I reckon what happened there was that she wanted to create chaos, saw it as a release of her fury; up until then she’d had reasons to justify her bloodlust, and she wasn’t anticipating losing that reason, especially while her fury remained. She hadn’t had her fill yet.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.