Debate time! I’m interested in your thoughts, Twitterverse: Is it unethical to own a gambling business in the knowledge that you’ll benefit from people becoming addicted, potentially ripping their lives apart? Go.pic.twitter.com/YX5HwCPUT6
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @sarahlongthorne
No it's not unethical. The owner of the gambling business is ethically bound to provide games that aren't complete scams, but in terms of the "life ruining potential" we might as well cancel McDonalds and alcohol because those have a way higher chance of life ruining potential.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Brbae_
Food an alcohol have deep roots in human tradition and culture dating back thousands of years. They are not made with the intention of being addictive, whereas gambling relies on it simply for the act that the house is only generally profitable over the long haul.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @sarahlongthorne
Seeing as heart disease causes more than a quarter (26 per cent) of all deaths in the UK; that's over 150,000 deaths each year, its vastly more unethical for food scientists to create and provide for an industry that perpetuates this level of death.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Brbae_
So... you DO think it's unethical? ;)
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @sarahlongthorne
Well it's all relative, I personally find gambling to be similar to drinking, it's an activity that I have no interest in, so I avoid it, but I dont care of others enjoy it or ruin their lives over it. Its only unethical if they target children or set up games where it's a scam
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Brbae_
Interesting. I once worked for a book publisher that didn't read the submissions; they were all put on a pile to be taken out at varying times to seed their hopes with requests for further work (which also wasn't read), waiting until they were hooked before asking for X grand.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @sarahlongthorne @Brbae_
This was marketing at people who couldn't (and wouldn't) get traditionally published, many of whom were mentally troubled or disadvantaged. You rarely saw more than £500 in royalties (average was much lower), but the author paid several thousand.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @sarahlongthorne @Brbae_
Disregarding the fact that the names on the contracts were all fake, do you believe this to be unethical?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Genuinely curious as I quit the place within three months because I felt the company was intentionally leading people on and exploiting them, especially vulnerable people. We employees were treated terribly, but that's a side note.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
MCV 30 Under 30 2021