Stop trying to make #sprinklecare happen. It's NOT going to happen.pic.twitter.com/Rowz5vtF9e
-
-
-
P.S. of course I mean the name. I will happily consider the policy!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have no desire to buy-in to Medicaid.
-
then don't? It wouldn't force you to have Medicaid
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let me help you with that: Decreasing medical capacity and increasing wait times as the program became more popular. Medicaid for All could shut down 1/3rd of all our medical capacity coast to coast. Can we talk about actual money available for reimbursement and cost shifting?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
By rationing care, paying docs, nurses, a lot less than we do, and saying 'no' to patients based on rational financial criteria and queuing.None of which American Consumers, nor the media will put up with. There is no magic in healthcare financing. Spend less, get less.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Definition of "elective"? And do you believe the private sector could move to "outcome based payments" if Docs didn't want to? Dig deeper. Canada, for example, doesn't cover prescription drugs nor do they pay taxes. Take that off my back, I'll cut costs 30%.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This would not work in Silicon Valley and other expensive parts of CA. There is very few doctors that are taking on new Medicaid patients.http://www.vcstar.com/story/news/2017/08/10/california-doctors-get-more-money-but-they-treat-more-poor-people/534960001/ …
-
A key provision is that Medicaid reimbursement rates are increased.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.