thinking is file rates assuming status quo policy - but their logic about requiring commitment in form of appropriated funds makes sense
-
-
-
Yeah, I think either approach feels reasonable to me - but seems like most are going with status quo rather than the BCBSNC route.
-
It will be interesting to see who changes assumptions running up to the August final deadline
-
Agree! Also interesting to see what other carriers assume as we get more rate filings over next few weeks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If all insurers did this it could really impact debate, esp. if all at once. Makes it so clear ACA isn't "dying" it's being killed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
MT
@CDInews: Commissioner@CA_DaveJones authorizes California health insurers to file two sets of rates...” http://www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-releases/2017/release039-17.cfm …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More insurers should do this--show how WH actions directly affects the bottom lines of those on the exchanges.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought California had asked for two sets of rate increases? With and without CSR
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.