@sarahkliff (Sotomayor had objected to the lack of requirement, in Wheaton, that they identify their third-party administrator.)
-
-
-
@theglipper Ah good point, will work that in there.e
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahkliff There’s one difference between the Wheaton order and this latest accommodation – in the new one, nonprofits have to identify…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sarahkliff Come on now, Hobby Lobby currently pays for 16 kinds of birth control for its employees. They just don't cover abortifacients. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahkliff@mattyglesias Like Wal-Mart. Corporate America once more mooching off of someone else.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sarahkliff@mattyglesias Good. But F Hobby Lobby and their ilk.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sarahkliff@mattyglesias best news of the day - thanks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sarahkliff their third-party administrator. That makes it more workable, but may draw new objections.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.