2) When you ask a source BEHIND THE SCENES, WITHOUT PUBLISHING ANYTHING about something they are uncomfortable with, the thing the source does is decline and possibly off the record explain why they're no-commenting.
-
-
Now please stop @-ing me with random lies or misconceptions you've swallowed whole or going full epistemological uncertainty about whether or not some detail that you can't even pin down is gonna get someone vanned in China (it won't, let it go, it won't)
Afficher cette discussionMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Apparently you cannot. "Wu told me she didn’t want to discuss her marital status, but before publishing the piece, I followed up with her." This Vice email is subsequent to the preceding email exchange. The one that actually matters. The one that established the boundaries.
-
reading is good, she said, pointing to the entire preceding thread
-
No, I read what you wrote. I just don't believe that's how it went down. If it were, Vice would just come out and deny Naomi's copy of that conversation. They have yet to deny her claim, which differs significantly from the Vice text. It's now a Vice-said-she-said.
-
It's almost like Jeong smug self-assuredness is emblematic of the culture that lead to Vice ignoring the safety concerns of their source. "Hey I'm concerned about this, could we clarify?" "no lol, learn to read" Clickbait tech journalists are the worst.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
could you,
@zeynep and@pvineetha just take over already and save the world from itself? -
Please yes.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
“Everyone else is wrong except me” is not a strong stance. At best you’re arguing that they’ve done nothing illegal ,but no-one is saying they did - they’re saying they are morally garbage people and endangered someone. Which they are and did.
-
Should Naomi have doxed them? No. She did it as she had no legal recourse in her situation. VICE *knew* that and took advantage of it. Naomi lashed out in the only way available to her. VICE *deliberately* maneuvered to put her there - that may not be illegal but it IS *wrong*.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
it is likely that others can read as well, just to let you know... They might not agree with the content and they might not believe that what's written in there justifies in any way what happened.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Pin tweet candidate.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.